Forum
head to head tournaments: no favors, no pga, no cheating
|
jurgen wrote
at 3:58 AM, Sunday November 9, 2008 EST
Ok , I get eorror messages posting in idea section so I will introduce it here first.
Rorschach and probably some others already suggested this idea so I would like to give them credit for this idea first. The idea is to have a head to head MTT: there would be 4 types of tables: * small ones just like the end phase of normal MTT's * medium size ones with only 1 stacks (similar to Friday 5 starting rounds) * medium size with normal dice distribution but also at least 50% grey lands * medium size with normal dice distribution but no grey lands Round 1: best out of 3 games for randomly assigned head to heads. every game of those 3 is randomly chosen from the 4 types mentioned above. all winners advance to round 2. Round 2 and above (depending how many players enter): similar best out of 3. quarter final head to heads (last 8):best out of 5 games semi final head to heads (last 4): best out of 7 games Final head to head: best out of 9 games. maybe best out of 7 is enough too. Of course, if a player wins the 2 first games in a best of 3, 3rd game doesn't have to be played. The idea is to start with 32 or 64 players but if say 54 players enter, 10 bots can be randomly added into the first round head to heads (shame on those who let a bot advance to round 2 ;-) Advantages: 1 no favors can be given 2 how can you pga/cheat in this type of MTT, only thing I can think of is that a large goup of players try to enter this mtt and eliminate all they can but agree to flag if they get into a head to head with their "leader". 3 no backstabbing, no diplomacy, no flagging, no endless discussions about who deserves what, no 2v1,.... ummmm, after typing all that, I hope there still will be some fun left, yikes 4 as rounds advance, more games to decide the winner. that should reduce the luck factor 5 Ryan can sleep a bit more, he doesn't need to keep a close eye at this type of MTT's ;-) |
|
Mike_Mike wrote
at 4:04 AM, Sunday November 9, 2008 EST Jurg,
head to head tournaments: no favors, no pga, no cheating You forgot... no FUN! |
|
Rorschach wrote
at 5:35 AM, Sunday November 9, 2008 EST Too many games IMO, but everything else I agree with.
|
|
montecarlo wrote
at 7:33 AM, Sunday November 9, 2008 EST in a head-to-head, my first strategy is always to msak the other guy.
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 12:09 PM, Sunday November 9, 2008 EST lol monte, I bet you would indeed even manage to get banned for msak-ing in a head to head tourney ;-)
and yeah rorsch, i know it's many games but I was thinking this would be best to give an advantage to the more skilled player in the head to head. The more games, the more difficult for the luckier worse player to win from the better player. But I was thinking about 20land, maybe 25 max, medium sized maps and small maps( MTT type for the final 2player games) because those games take only a few minutes to play anyway. |
|
xy< wrote
at 1:16 PM, Sunday November 9, 2008 EST head to head = lucky start, lucky rolls, no skills
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 2:57 PM, Sunday November 9, 2008 EST orlafede, head to head = also going into a fight without friends, without backstabbers, without truces, without hiding or begging for a safe 2nd/3rd, without the frustration of a lame early flagger for 2nd screwing the chances for a fun game, without people refusing to flag, ninja's or players killing the good position of a player by taking as much of lands just before they get killed,...
I am confident that I can win from a less skilled player in a best of 3 in 80% or more of the case, 90% in the best of 5. If head to heads were all about luck, we better give the top2 in mtt equal points instead of letting them figt. |
|
MadWilly wrote
at 2:58 PM, Sunday November 9, 2008 EST how about this:
http://kdice.com/ideas/ideas/44768289 |
|
jurgen wrote
at 3:00 PM, Sunday November 9, 2008 EST hehe Willy, looks like I missed that idea but like I said, the moment I tried to post, the idea section was down... but you got my vote now too, great idea!
|
|
MadWilly wrote
at 3:37 PM, Sunday November 9, 2008 EST and you got my vote although i dont find that idea that important.
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 3:55 PM, Sunday November 9, 2008 EST I will just post the link here: http://kdice.com/ideas/ideas/44768305
|