Forum
concerning the trading of favors, both ingame and pregame
|
montecarlo wrote
at 4:34 PM, Thursday November 6, 2008 EST
ive had some very engaging conversations today concering the trading of favors in kdice. so i thought i would ramble on them in an overly long forum post, since i am montecarlo.
1) PREGAME FAVORS its agreed by all that these should never be made. high tables are renowned for pregame favors, which is why a lot of newer players refuse to play at higher tables. "whenever i sit there, people give me last place because they dont know my." "everyone says hi to each other, except for me." "my flag is never respected up there because people don't want to see their friends lose points." ad infinitum. i used to get upset when i saw newer players state this all the time. no! thats not true! but now i have realized that, whereas it may not be true for me, it definitely is true for some other high table players. rewarding your friendly friends, and picking on the newer players. im not saying everyone does it up there, but a lot of players do it. and the thing that sucks is that the ENTIRE top players get branded as point whore pga otfs because of the sins of a few. the other funny thing about the newer players who bitch endlessly about the elite class is that they quickly assume the 'holier-than-thou' stance. its like when i would teach sunday school for high schoolers at my church. there was this one dude who sort of a geek (arent we all?), and he was always saying the right things, like 'premarital sex is wrong, because blah blah blah', 'gettin drunk is wrong because blah blah blah'. finally i had to pull this guy aside and be like, dude, have you EVER had a girl try to make out with you? no? then you cant judge others, because youve never had to deal with that temptation. so stfu. except i didnt say stfu, cus i was a sunday school teacher, ofc. anyway, the point of that montecarlo long story was that a lot of these newer players love saying the right thing: 'pga is bad, trading favors is bad, blah blah blah.' but honestly they have NEVER had someone offer them a silent pga truce at a high table before. ive seen this personally several times. as soon as a newer player feels the giddiness of how much easier the game is when a new high player friend of theirs refuses to attack them, they LOVE it. and then the newer player is absorbed into the pga/trading favors upper echelon. this is not good. let me tell you from personal experience, it is fucking hard to say no to a silent pga. ive had two specific players try to offer them to me in the past few months: bsn and detenmile. both of these guys are class acts, very likeable, good personalities. there happened to be a couple consecutive games in both cases where we truced ingame and won, and shared drinks and laughs and prostitutes afterwards. then this unspoken question comes up. 'hmmm, weve won two games in a row, i'll assume that monte wont attack me this game, and i wont pwn him with my early 8stack but go the other way.' jesus, it is hard to turn that down. i remember bsn saying things in chatbox like 'monte???' when i would attack him. so this brings us to: 2) INGAME FAVORS without realizing it, this became one of my strongest strategies in a lot of games. and im not alone, lots of people (especially at the top tables) play this way. ill just give you a case in point, one which happened in a tourney today between a relative newcomer (Zergme) and a complete kdice loser (me). round 1: my turn is before Zergme's turn. Zergme has 3 stacks near each other, but my 4stack is planted right in the middle of them. he has a 5stack next to my 4stack. ive got two options here: connect to the 4stack, and leave it there and itll probably become a 5stack (hopefully), and then ill have Zergme as an enemy the rest of the game, because ive got his 5stack in my back. the other option is be nice to Zergme, move the 4stack out of his way and connect elsewhere with it, then he gets a very easy start and connects everything. before i moved i said in chatbox: 'no worries Zergme, im moving that 4 north, take one from me and connect'. my ultimate meaning behind this was: 'lets truce, run your 5 east, and we have very strong position on everyone.' Zerg said: 'thanks.' so i moved the 4 north, connected, spread out a little, because i assumed Zerg would be nice and we were basically truced. wrong. Zerg didnt run the 5 east, he just took one of mine to connect and left his big stacks pointed at me. a couple turns later, someone said lets counter the Zerg/monte truce, and Zerg was like, huh? we arent truced. and he ate my tail and started taking my territories. i got completely blinded with rage, because where i come from, this is a backstab. i fuckin gave you a favor by not destroying your game in round 1 by leaving you cut, so you owe me, asshole. but lets look at this from Zergs perspective. he didnt ask me to move that 4stack, he just said thanks afterwards. basically i was trying to bully him into a truce that i could take advantage of. i forcibly gave him a favor. and forcible expected him to be grateful. i realize now that this isnt really that fair, or logical. but this happens ALL the time on higher tables, and its the reason a bunch of the elite players bitch so much about newcomers. all of the elite class can tell stories about newer players who sit in a top game, they are neighbors with each other, then the elite player moves away from the newer player, basically implying 'dont worry about me, i didnt pwn you, and i dont want to fight you because if i do, we both get last.' but then the newer player interprets it as 'haha, hes running away from me, and now i can eat all his short stacks he left behind.' its a fairly common miscommunication at the higher tables. anyways, im not sure if its fair to forcibly give someone a favor and then get pissed at them if they dont accept the favor. i publicly apologize to ZergMe for the next several rounds of the tournament where i followed him in the chatbox and kept telling everyone to kill him because he was a backstabber. we talked afterwards, and after hearing his perspective, and seeing his perspective, i agree with him: it wasnt a backstab at all, it was me forcing him into a tough situation, and he happened to make the choice to attack me instead of whatever else. sorry Zerg. ok, thats enough. start discussion. in your replies please make it clear whether you are talking about 1) PREGAME FAVORS or 2) INGAME FAVORS. and on a side note, tourneys are really really awesome, and these pregame favors are threatening to force Ryan to close them down because they are becoming rampant at the end of the tourney. this is up to the joiners of the tourney, to tell themselves from round to round, "i will play this next game as though i did not have any previous memory of what happened in the rest of this tournament." believe me, its a hard thing to force yourself to do, but it is possible (i speak from experience). |
|
monte is a liar wrote
at 5:11 PM, Thursday November 6, 2008 EST I just answer with your own words monte...
CoMik is here montecarlo: i fuckin was denied a 1st because of screencaps bcmatteagles: i'd like to see them get docked points for that crap dasfury: that was a wasted game montecarlo: lame-ass fiero bcmatteagles: shadolin has played a fair month montecarlo: oh look heres a screencap and monte is in it, ignore the fact that he tried to 4v4 nuflis on the next turn dasfury: no dasfury: shad has pgas too bcmatteagles: not many bcmatteagles: and he doesnt ask for them montecarlo: i still say sam should get a gold png dasfury: he plays the favor style of pga dasfury: like fin dasfury: and ffb bcmatteagles: well that's not pga though montecarlo: true he does do that dasfury: it is montecarlo: it is meagles montecarlo: you just rotate your pgas every few games bcmatteagles: cause that's an enemy 2 games later bcmatteagles: he just truces in round 1 montecarlo: its harder to detect CoMik: Meh 2.5k? CoMik: Guys? montecarlo: i used to pull that shit all the eime montecarlo: time* bcmatteagles: last month monte bcmatteagles: or 2 months ago montecarlo: in january bcmatteagles: that's all u did montecarlo: and february montecarlo: not as much any more montecarlo: cus leek was actually right montecarlo: about it being lame mrRo is here bcmatteagles: that's impossible bcmatteagles: leek is never rihgt montecarlo: dude, ive had 2 people desperately try to be my bitch the last few months montecarlo: and it kills me to not accept all their pgas montecarlo: 1) bsn montecarlo: and 2) detenmile Luin is here montecarlo: theyre hilarious montecarlo: bsn was the best montecarlo: because he would assume pga This is copied out of the chatboy, where monte confirming he was PGAing to win trophies... |
|
samisu wrote
at 5:21 PM, Thursday November 6, 2008 EST Hm, don't wanna put my tongue up in montes a-hole, but i totally agree with him. Great post, even from a noobs point of view, i dont know what you left to discuss about.
For the tourneys it will always be a problem, not many can put their thoughts aside which are still fresh from previous battles or favor-plays. And when you do erase the favors someone has offered you in a previous game from your mind, your friend will probably feel backstabbed and become an enemy, making it only harder to win in the end. |
|
shadolin wrote
at 5:24 PM, Thursday November 6, 2008 EST It nice to see that I am a part of conversation after tournaments end.
I do not PGA i may truce when it works and makes sense, but I don't PGA. Three months ago i was one of those new players. I made top three in my 2nd and 3rd full month in kdice. This is because i play a lot and (i would like to think) I can spot situations in games where trucing makes sense. Thanks Matt for the defense, i have heard that some higher players don't like me much because I am challenging the top spots. I think monte had a lot of good points and some very accurate statements. But i still believe that the top players want games to be fair and would except more lower players if they talked more in chat and learned the small hints of play that happen at a higher level. |
|
leekstep wrote
at 5:29 PM, Thursday November 6, 2008 EST Nice reply CoMik!
I can understand why you would be angry. Ryan banned you because you are a better and more loyal cheater than most. You are a better player than most. As I was watching you play Cody, I started AIMing you in disgust because of your blatant PGAs with jpc4p. Jpc4p is one of the worst players I have ever seen, always relying on friendships instead of gameboard or chatbox strategy. kDice should be about the gameboard and chatbox, not about PGAs friendships favors. etc. Monte admits cheating, but that doesnt mean he is a liar. Thats what it takes to play at the high tables. He doesnt like it, I respect him for wanting to change. Monte is actually extremely honest, one of the most honest kDicers ever. Anyway I exuberantly applaud Ryan for doing something about your cheating Cody. I hope its just a start! I know you can win a month playing legit. It is tough to be punished for doing something that most everyone else does. Anyway its a happy day! Tournaments are awesome, scoring is awesome, the integrity of each individual competition is beginning to be recognized! Cheers to Ryan! Find some mods to help you stop the cheating Ryan. After a few 1 hour or 1 day punishments, people might be less likely to cheat. |
|
Cal Ripken wrote
at 5:39 PM, Thursday November 6, 2008 EST "Jpc4p is one of the worst players I have ever seen, always relying on friendships instead of gameboard or chatbox strategy."
man, that's funny. Sorry you feel that way. I remember back in June when you accused me of sharing my account (I think it's because I won a bunch of 10ks?) and started this whole rumor of that being the reason I won first. (if anyone had checked the IPs for me that month they could see all of them were based in Charlottesville VA, on my home and work computers). You were full of shit then, and you're full of it now too Leek. Anyway, I don't know what I did to you to warrant such hostility, but I've always tried to play in a friendly manner with both new and old players and dont think I've done anything to you- I'm all for an open discussion like Monte's doing, talking about how fair/awkward remembering favors and such is and what can be done to define/fix the unfairness that results. Sorry I don't mean to hijack this thread, but I wanted to respond to juvenile insults from a juvenile person. |
|
Cal Ripken wrote
at 5:41 PM, Thursday November 6, 2008 EST by the way, I'm leaving the office now, so if anyone wants to have an adult conversation about anything, it'll be a few hours before I respond.
|
|
MadWilly wrote
at 5:41 PM, Thursday November 6, 2008 EST Well. about tourneys, since theres alot at stake at once... why not make tourneys anonymous ryan? i mean you dont have to go as far as shutting down chatbox just hiding players. Would help about pregame favours and level out alot of the psychological sideeffects. Its a shot into the blue though.
Right now i feel i have been more often falsely accused of being PGA while actually profiting from what everybody seems to talk of favor style of play. just commentign so monte doesnt have to cry. I don't want my Fans to cry. MW |
|
leekstep wrote
at 5:43 PM, Thursday November 6, 2008 EST jcp4p i did accuse you of account sharing because fiero told me you were. We went over this. fiero is a big liar and was probably just trying to get me involved, I dont know. I trusted fiero when fiero told me u were sharing your account. I could have been wrong.
I do stand by the fact that you dont do shit on the board or in the chatbox to succeed, other than being really reliable for your long time friends. Perhaps you may be a decent player, but you have never shown any skill in the chatbox or the gameboard. You just play really nice with a bunch of regular top players and whine and act offended if they dont help you. |
|
detenmile wrote
at 6:42 PM, Thursday November 6, 2008 EST monte you where a convenient body shield in most cases. But you can ask Dicey, bone roller, Johnson, or basically anybody else that "PGA" with that i will roll them if i feel it suites me. Granted given the choice of attacking you or a complete stranger i will usually attack the stranger.
all in all a good post though seems to have all the truth in the game behind it. |
|
Tit-Mouse wrote
at 7:04 PM, Thursday November 6, 2008 EST I have yet to see a post from Leekstep that actually had something worthwhile to say. Just endless amounts of vitriolic BS. Leek your colon must be suffering from a blockage because all of the crap is spewing out of your mouth. Your breath must stink something awful.
|