no

i say it is.

favours carried over from one game to another is giving other players on the table a disadvantage.

I tend to agree with Shev. I don't like "favors" from game-to-game. It is occasionally necessary to be nice to someone in-game in order to better your own finishing position, but that should be the end of it. Next game "favors" are wrong and they should be considered PGA.

That said, you will find me to be in the minority on this subject amongst those who play the higher tables. I don't feel that PGAing is rampant in the higher tables like the rest of KDice does, but carry-overs from previous games do occur, and that shouldn't happen.

Will the player who has never shown any good-will or ill-will to another player because of experiences in a previous game please step forward....

HERE I AM ^^

no not really, i think these definitions are to strickt, they wsy upper PGA usually happens, is with a prompt from a player by certain moves, and the player will only do this with players they know will take the hint.

but this is not really a PGA, thats just beeing good neighbours.

i think that a real proof of a PGA is two players on opposite site of the board, and the centerplayer flags 2nd, before any fighting occur.

At least it is PGBTOP (Pre Game Bias Towards One Player).

Sooooooo, is Sinth playing again? SUP MAN!