i'm in a game, 3 of us left - kbinter is in 1st in the south and very much spread out, 4:20 is flagged in 2nd and fairly well stacked in the north, and i'm in 3rd, a bit spread out but my core of short stacks is well protected by big outer stacks.

i announce to the board that i'm going to try for 1st and start attacking kbinter's exposed flanks. i ask 4:20 to stay neutral and he does so. eventually i get almost even with kbinter and red starts nibbling at both of us evenly, taking lands that had very few dice in them. i figure he's being neutral so long as he's attacking us both evenly and isn't going for cuts.

kbinter gets vexed saying that he and i should take out 4:20 due to his attacks on both of us. they hadn't really bothered me much given the lands he took were sapping dice and making it slower to accumulate reserves.

4:20 and kbinter start scrapping it out and i'm suddenly in 1st due to their infighting. i protect my cuts from both of them and that's it, taking no more lands. i stack up to +20something with a slight lead in lands.

kbinter decides that this is a moral outrage and throws the game, attacking me 5 times and winning none of them. he then flags 3rd, ending the game and i get 1st.

4:20 leaves, after mentioning that he was impressed that i gave it a shot. kbinter declares that i'm now his PGE because i didn't team up with him vs red (despite the fact that red was no threat to me whatsoever).

i think kbinter's way overreacting. thoughts?