Forum
Scoring system still blows
|
NeoconRuler wrote
at 2:09 AM, Saturday August 9, 2008 EDT
if only I could count the number of games where I strategerized myself to 2nd place only to get +25 points. Or to 3rd place only to get -50 points...
The scoring system is still ridiculous. Canadians need not reply. |
Replies 1 - 8 of 8
|
Adonia wrote
at 9:23 AM, Saturday August 9, 2008 EDT Stop sitting in a corner and earn some dom! Also, Canadians are cool so be nice.
|
|
Aiden wrote
at 1:56 PM, Saturday August 9, 2008 EDT couldn't agree more.
100 games in and i have 15 points. negatives are too high |
|
botch wrote
at 2:27 PM, Saturday August 9, 2008 EDT Um...sitting idly round after round is going to point-suck you, as it should. You're not going to be rewarded graciously for sitting around waiting for someone to lose a critical roll or move a stack so you can snipe it and continue sitting there.
Start taking risks or stop bitching. |
|
kam|k2 wrote
at 3:16 PM, Saturday August 9, 2008 EDT botch, youre so fuckin right (:
|
|
DoobiusMalcor wrote
at 10:52 AM, Saturday August 16, 2008 EDT Bunch of dumb ass replies as expected. It takes strategy to snipe out a high place.
|
|
manbearpig wrote
at 11:51 PM, Saturday August 16, 2008 EDT Geez, we need to stop sucking...
126 games, net loss of 2239 points. :D |
|
NightEternal wrote
at 12:03 PM, Sunday August 17, 2008 EDT I agree with this. In the first few rounds, if you get screwed by turn position, or dice layout, you really only have like 1-3 minutes of gameplay and lose 300 points. (on the 500 tables, where it's argued that the 'better' players often play)
I think that the point loss shouldn't be horrible until at least the 2nd or 3rd round. The game isn't all that fun if you drop 1000 points in 3 games due to bad luck. |
|
Rorschach wrote
at 12:56 PM, Sunday August 17, 2008 EDT No, better players play on the 2.5k tables. It's -1k for 7th there.
|
