Forum
add ppg to leaderboard?
|
montecarlo wrote
at 9:00 AM, Monday June 9, 2008 EDT
Ryan, im enjoying clicking into others' stats pages to see what their ppgs are. would it be ok to add ppg to the leaderboard (not a separately-ordered list, but just an extra number next to the top 25's names), or would that make the leaderboard too crowded? i would really enjoy seeing top 25 ppgs all on the same page. (bragging rights, ofc).
|
|
captainLAGER wrote
at 10:02 AM, Monday June 9, 2008 EDT I would definitely like to see that, too.
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 10:04 AM, Monday June 9, 2008 EDT ppg would be more informative if it also included the average table level played at, which could be computed just as easily.
|
|
Ryan wrote
at 10:28 AM, Monday June 9, 2008 EDT Keep posting stats ideas... theres a lot more that can be done
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 12:54 PM, Monday June 9, 2008 EDT Ryan, I assume the PPG is just for the current month. Is that correct?
|
|
Sophalis wrote
at 1:26 PM, Monday June 9, 2008 EDT LOL my ppg is 1
|
|
lesplaydices wrote
at 1:35 PM, Monday June 9, 2008 EDT How about Top 25 in depth. Like the pre-January leaderboard page.
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 1:44 PM, Monday June 9, 2008 EDT Ryan:
On the subject of stats: also, explain the ones we have. How is the percent of dom calculated that shows up in the stats for each game? Points per root game is probably a more meaningful stat that points per game. |
|
jurgen wrote
at 1:50 PM, Monday June 9, 2008 EDT When skrumgaer posted the TAPL ranks of the top5 this month, I figured hey why always ask skrumgaer to do this for me, I could do it myself instead of always being so lazy.
so I did a few myself but it bothered me that a place % of 26 24 18 12 8 6 6 gives same TAPL (if same number of games played) as a player with 12 18 6 6 8 24 26 1st -> 7th. I think TAPL can be modified a bit to get a good measure of kdice skill (TOKS score?). I am still playing with the formula to give the accurate weight for the difference from 14% for every place. The idea is to get more than 14% for places 1->4 and get a lower % than 14% for places 5 to 7. A 20% for 1st and 18% for 2nd shows more skill than 18% 20% so I tried incorporating that by multiplying with factors of 4/3/2/1/-2/-3/-4 So the formula looks something like this (it's looks a bit different in excel form but this is a more simple representation) (4*(D1)^2)+(3*(D2)^2)+(2*(D3)^2)+(1*(D4)^2)+(2*(D5)^2)+(3*(D6)^2)+(4*(D7)^2) DX being the difference with 14% you get for place X. For places 5 6 and 7 obviously it's a value below 14% that will give a positive contribution to the TOKS doesn't show here but there is in the actual excel formula. Last month I had 18 24 26 8 6 6 12 which yielded into 1024 TOKS. I had about 275 PPG last month and I think the best way to get a good measure of a players kdice skill, both factors (PPG and this TOKS 1-7 place profile) need about 50% weight. So right now I would propose PPG +(TOKS/4) |
|
Awesomeness! wrote
at 2:36 PM, Monday June 9, 2008 EDT this is probably so obvious but what is ppg?
is it points per game as that is only acrynm i can think of |
|
Thraxle wrote
at 2:37 PM, Monday June 9, 2008 EDT Yup!
|