Forum
Flagging SUCKS
|
Quang wrote
at 12:24 PM, Thursday April 17, 2008 EDT
The ability to flag sucks... there should be rooms designated no flagging...
People are to score/points sensitive, that's why they try secure 2nd/3rd by flagging I thought the game was about world domination, not lets get third to not loose points. imho when you flag you give up, you should be in last. Not flag, and the dominate player attacks the next guy. What do you guys think? Has flagging ruin the game for you? |
Replies 1 - 3 of 3
|
mr Kreuzfeld wrote
at 5:20 AM, Friday April 18, 2008 EDT flagging is what i think make this game playable, it also alows for some very interresting stratregy-options
|
|
MiCao wrote
at 6:35 AM, Friday April 18, 2008 EDT I second that: flagging sucks. it leads to endless heated discussions whether its allowed to attack a flagged player, whether a flagged player should attack lower/higher ranked once etc. flagging is indeed just for securing points, doesn't induce a lot of strategy.
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 8:22 AM, Friday April 18, 2008 EDT i guess sometimes people just need a reason to complain
remove the flag option and probably the same people will post complaints about how they were a clear second but got killed by 1st (who didn't see you were settling for 2nd)... or that they were clearly the strongest player but still got killed by everyone (cuz noone was allowed to flag and they had nothing to lose anymore anyway) flag-free rooms could be fun but please keep the current system as the standard (just maybe add an instant surrender flag to it) . |
