Forum
stat idea
|
FYYFF wrote
at 4:49 PM, Friday March 14, 2008 EDT
In addition to number of games, how about a percentage of games played at 0, 100, 500, 2500 tables. I'm curious as to whether to be a top player in the new system its better to play a lot of games at the lower tables or a few games at the higher tables.
It seems more and more I see to top 100 players at the same 100pt table. They extend the professional courtesy to each other that they both end up in the top 3 so they can rack up positive points (I don't want to use the dreaded PGA term, but they do seem to look out for each other a lot.) I'm wondering if this is how they generate those rankings or it truly is "we just wanted to play and this is the only board" excuse. |
Replies 1 - 3 of 3
|
Pat Whalen wrote
at 11:21 PM, Friday March 14, 2008 EDT getting 150 points a game will not get you to top 25 very fast, unless u play 1000 games a month like bombardier
|
|
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 12:23 PM, Saturday March 15, 2008 EDT I agree, your monthly stats should show where you have been playing.
|
|
Shevar wrote
at 11:34 AM, Sunday March 16, 2008 EDT there is way more potential in the stat section.
the point mentioned here is a good one. There was another idea posted by skrum about average attacks per turn or something like that. it sounded very good, but it is now burried under tons of useless topics. |
