Forum
ATTENTION RYAN : Max at tables ..... not just a Min
|
These Dice Suck wrote
at 11:29 AM, Tuesday March 11, 2008 EDT
Ryan, I really think you need a min for these tables... (0 - 100) (100-500) (500-2000)
How should someone who's in the top 100 be able to sit with... well someone like me who can't win to save his life... I remember when you got 100 points you had to move up (progress). I don't see why someone who has 20,000 points or 5,000 points can and should be able to sit or even 500 points and 3 guy's fewer than 100 can sit and have a game. I?m personally losing interest in a game that I sit in to enjoy and with in 3 rounds I?ve been annihilated. It's not as fun when you sit in and get killed in the 1st or 2nd round by someone with a lot more knowledge than you. Maybe you should have a beginner?s lounge or training area. Just something to think about. |
Replies 1 - 3 of 3
|
mr Kreuzfeld wrote
at 12:28 PM, Tuesday March 11, 2008 EDT i think it might make sense to have a upper limit at 0 and 100 tables. but remeber you often need 2.5K pts to even start at 500 tables.
i think no matter how many pts you have you should always be able to sit in at 500 tables, because there are times of the day when they are the highest tables running. |
|
These cards suck wrote
at 2:31 PM, Tuesday March 11, 2008 EDT Yeah! You go TDS!!!!
|
|
FYYFF wrote
at 5:38 PM, Tuesday March 11, 2008 EDT even worse, it seems like you get two 100 players (say lesplaydice and opiumwhore for example) who hang out at the 500 tables so they PGA and farm the lower tables. It's like the rest of us are just there to help them build up their point totals.
There are more people who like playing kdice than the guys competing for top 100 rankings each month. |
