the current flagging system, frequently leads to a situation where in the end game with 3 roughly equal players fighting it out.....the person who happens to be in 2nd at that moment in time flags, and it's automatically a 1st 2nd truce.....



There are other bad points to the fact that someone, once flagged, can continue to attack with (relative) immunity to having to fight people who are stronger than them, but the general feeling is that there are good reasons for it.


I suggest the following two changes.....

1)When someone is flagged they cannot attack.

2)When a flagged person is attacked, they are automatically unflagged.



This means that when the people in 2nd and third flag early in the game it won't be a 3person truce totally screwing everyone else and the other 4 players can still try to take on the person in 1st.....but, a flagged person can defend themselves because if they're attacked their flag will come off.

In other words when someone flagged they would be flagging to every single other player, not just the people higher than them.....but would still be able to defend themselves if neccesary.


Your thoughts?