Forum
Last day of the month phenomenon
|
?\ wrote
at 12:03 PM, Friday February 29, 2008 EST
It's the last day of the month and some top 25 players seem to become very risk averse and prefer playing at 0 tables...
|
|
captainLAGER wrote
at 12:21 PM, Friday February 29, 2008 EST you probably met montecarlo. he just wanted exactly 100.000 points.
|
|
montecarlo wrote
at 1:13 PM, Friday February 29, 2008 EST yes. have fun figuring out what people are trying to fine tune their scores to end the month on. i know that dasfury, jpc4p, and wishbone are all trying to tune theirs in.
|
|
petomni wrote
at 1:19 PM, Friday February 29, 2008 EST how is this for a phenomenon?
February 28 Games: 36 High: 11,788 Low: 1,764 ↑2,335 / ↓1,126 1st-7th: 25% 25% 13% 8% 8% 5% 13% Yes, 50% chance of me getting 1st or 2nd (waiting to hear cries of pga) |
|
Firehouse wrote
at 4:23 PM, Friday February 29, 2008 EST I think that if you are ranked higher than 2500 you should not be allowed to play on ) tables. It is unfair to new players.
|
|
FYYFF wrote
at 4:23 PM, Friday February 29, 2008 EST even worse, you have high ranking players (Cutekittens and Bertrand Donnes) teaming up together on those tables to battle the newbies
|
|
Pat Whalen wrote
at 11:42 PM, Friday February 29, 2008 EST ok so das got asset and wish got eleet (following in monte's footsteps i see) but what does jpc's say...? tteol? does that mean somthing?
|
|
fiero600 wrote
at 3:38 AM, Saturday March 1, 2008 EST why does pet point out his 1/2% stats? thats less than my entire monte...
|
|
fiero600 wrote
at 3:50 AM, Saturday March 1, 2008 EST month*
|
|
montecarlo wrote
at 5:01 AM, Saturday March 1, 2008 EST jpc lamed out. he was aiming for 80085. to counter that, das was aiming for 45535, but got to impatient with the fine tuning process (it can get quite frustrating) and stopped when he saw 45537. integral also hit 1337, but any noob can do that, so thats hardly worth mentioning.
|
|
bengarchy wrote
at 10:01 AM, Saturday March 1, 2008 EST Looks like das' score got rounded to 45535 anyway. Sweet. It ain't so '1337' but I was trying to fine tune to 20000 myself. Got too annoyed and stopped at 20002, which looked kinda nice too. So I was puzzled when I saw my score'd changed to 20000, and did a bit of looking around...
Seems that all the scores before Jan've been multiplied by 5, so they all end in 0 or 5 now. Jan's scores were re-weighted based on monte's 231337 -> 100k, leaving him with arguably the neatest pair of scores ever. My theory was that Feb's scores were rounded to the nearest 5 to match the rest aesthetically, but Jan's scores weren't rounded, so I'm not so sure. 'Nuff geeky speculation heh, looking forward to seeing Ryan's blog post on Feb! |