Forum
He rolled a 47!!!
|
BreakYoSelfFool wrote
at 5:26 PM, Tuesday February 26, 2008 EST
I was on my way to a lopsided victory 20 territories vs 10 territories all 8s when the strangest thing happened.
superbadu defended 8v8, 33 to 47, (4,5,1,6,5,4,5,3 to 6,6,6,6,5,6,6,6) Almost as soon as I could say wow that was impressive, he cut me in half with a string of 6 straight 8v8 defenses and 7 straight victories. I'm still not sure if it was just good luck for him or bad luck for me. game#: 2,415,216 table: just_jack Feb 26, 4:56 PM CST Needless to say I lost. Just wondering if anyone else had seen or rolled a 47 or 48. |
Replies 1 - 5 of 5
|
integral wrote
at 5:30 PM, Tuesday February 26, 2008 EST I wasn't there to see it but someone screenshotted the 48.
It's in the forums somewhere if you're willing to search. I did see the infamous rolling an 8 with an 8 stack. That was equally glorious. |
|
firefox1 wrote
at 6:08 PM, Tuesday February 26, 2008 EST i screenshotted a 48 about a year ago under a different name. then someone tried to say that wasn't any more interesting to roll 6,6,6,6,6,6,6,6 than it was to roll 4,5,1,6,5,4,5,3. people are idiots
|
|
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 7:23 PM, Tuesday February 26, 2008 EST Wishbone got pwnd by a 48, that was hilarious, but yeah the comment is lost along with the rest of the old wall comments. all 1's and all 6's rolls are always cool.
|
|
|
firefox1 wrote
at 1:09 AM, Wednesday February 27, 2008 EST i just rolled a 55 .. gotta love the test server
impossible to count the freakin dice though |
|
fuzzycat wrote
at 5:25 AM, Wednesday February 27, 2008 EST firefox, a year ago this reports always came with a complaign "its the proof the random generator must be broken", which is idiocy. Luckly this moron motion finally died somewhere.
And yes rolling 4,5,1,6,5,4,5,3 is just as unlikely as rolling 6,6,6,6,6,6,6,6 |
