Forum
are the probabilities weighted?
|
Ampyxx wrote
at 1:49 AM, Tuesday February 26, 2008 EST
http://kdice.wikispaces.com/
based on this chart, unless I have my math wrong, it seems like the probabilities are weighted. for 2v1 wouldn't it be a range of 2-12 for the 2 dice, and 1-6 for the 1 dice? that would be 66 entries in the table. Then you would divide the number of defeats over the total number and multiply by 100% to get the chances? Well, in any regards, it's good to know that they are weighted for fairness. |
|
|
Ampyxx wrote
at 2:11 AM, Tuesday February 26, 2008 EST aha, I kinda get it...
|
|
|
Ampyxx wrote
at 2:54 AM, Tuesday February 26, 2008 EST and now I'm an idiot lol.
|
|
CP03 wrote
at 12:22 PM, Tuesday February 26, 2008 EST you are an idiot for looking at wiki for kdice information.......almost everything there is inaccurate........
|
|
|
Ampyxx wrote
at 5:54 PM, Tuesday February 26, 2008 EST it's funny how when the masses hear something, instead of investigating the truth behind it, they take it as fact. It's just code, and I realize what mistake I made now. Grow up and stop believing in Santa Claus.
|
|
firefox1 wrote
at 6:06 PM, Tuesday February 26, 2008 EST wow this was a waste of time
yes, your math was initially wrong. it is way easier to roll 7 with two dice than it is to roll 12. six times easier, in fact |
|
fuzzycat wrote
at 5:28 AM, Wednesday February 27, 2008 EST The wiki has an indepth explanation how the probabilities are calculated. And CP30 these *are* correct, until the last decimal. I know the scoring stuff is very out of date...
|
|
|
fuzzycat wrote
at 5:29 AM, Wednesday February 27, 2008 EST unfortunally cp30 you look like you still behave like the same tard a year ago.
|
|
|
CP03 wrote
at 7:33 AM, Wednesday February 27, 2008 EST once in a while you see fuzzycat come back and defend issues relating wiki. he always come at the right time when wiki is mentioned in the forum and you wont hear from him otherwise. it seems to me that he has never left but is playing and commenting on the forum using a different user name. when when people attacking his wiki, he fights back.
may be you are Ampyxx, fuzzy. you started a topic to promote your wiki and then respond to it.....clever....... ok may be not all information is inaccurate, but about 99%. and most of the entries are fuzzycat's personal opinions anyways so it cannot be used as a guidebook. by the way, fuzzy, how much have you earned so far from this wiki??? enough for you to donate some to ryan? |
|
|
fuzzycat wrote
at 8:03 AM, Wednesday February 27, 2008 EST c3po, stop being such a enormous paranoid tard please.
As you know, most of the stuff wasn't written by me, but others. Secondly I earned ZERO of it. If you can't get it into your small head, try to make a wikispaces account and earn a single cent from it. Its a *free host*, the host earns the money for well, hosting the stuff. Idiot. |
|
kdicefreak wrote
at 9:04 AM, Wednesday February 27, 2008 EST Funny you only address the wiki issue but not the alternate account.......suspicious......i am now 81.09563% sure you are using an alt account and that there is a 89.587452% probability that it's Ampyxx
|
