Forum
odd
|
5er wrote
at 5:46 PM, Sunday January 27, 2008 EST
endgame, me, purple and yellow.
yellow had what i figured was a fairly insurmountable lead, so i flagged for 2nd place. yellow out of sheer...impatience? starts overextending, and attacks both purple and i even though i'd previously announced that i'd flagged in the chat (thus letting him/her know that i posed no further threat). so i started attacking him/her again (bad form to attack somebody who announced that they're flagged, imo), as did purple. Yellow then flagged out for 3rd. and somehow purple ended up 1st even though i had far more land. in this situation shouldn't I have gotten 2nd, given that i was 1st among those left on the board? |
Replies 1 - 3 of 3
|
leekstep wrote
at 6:50 PM, Sunday January 27, 2008 EST you mean to say 'shouldn't i have gotten 1st', and the answer is no
|
|
Beals wrote
at 10:44 PM, Sunday January 27, 2008 EST Once you concede 2nd, that's as good as it gets. Like you found out, doesn't mean you have to stop attacking number one.
|
|
WayneRooney wrote
at 11:35 PM, Sunday January 27, 2008 EST If purple flagged 2nd, then you'd have won but he played smart (maybe?) and didnt flag maybe hoping you guys would attack and get 1st
|
