Forum
social or tactical...which do you prefer?
|
Awesomeness! wrote
at 9:31 AM, Monday January 7, 2008 EST
i heard on the grapevine that ryan wanted to make this game socialable (which is cool) but personally, i think the balance between tactics and being social is now tilted towards being more verbal in the chat!
i think this is a wonderful game but some of the tactics have been lost... |
Replies 1 - 6 of 6
|
kdicefreak wrote
at 9:57 AM, Monday January 7, 2008 EST what do you mean by more social?
"now tilted towards being more verbal in the chat!" well, the chat box is not working properly on IE.....so....... |
|
Nuffy wrote
at 9:59 AM, Monday January 7, 2008 EST so.... install firefox?
|
|
Hakapeci wrote
at 1:02 PM, Monday January 7, 2008 EST to be honest the game would be more pure in it tactic if players can't see name, only color... but of course all chat would start with "I'm xy" to still make available to make PGA-1s or make discrimination...
friendship not a bad thing and I got several help too, but the game would be more clear and 100% depending on "skill & luck" is we could avouid discriminating. social parts only makes higher chance to get unfair opponents or decisions what not from the actual situation, rather from friendship or pga... there should be anonym maps where you can still gain points, but without chat and don't see the opponent's name... for pure game. |
|
Big Jumblies wrote
at 5:44 PM, Monday January 7, 2008 EST The leaders in the game I've noticed are very skilled in tactically AND socially. SO the answer is both.
|
|
JeremyS wrote
at 6:31 PM, Monday January 7, 2008 EST Jumblies nailed it on the head.
|
|
7destroy wrote
at 10:15 PM, Monday January 7, 2008 EST To no names and no chat, only colors:
Do you really think PGA people talk in public chat to each other? |
