Forum
stats idea: post stats for different table levels
|
montecarlo wrote
at 5:42 AM, Friday November 16, 2007 EST
there has been some ongoing discussion at the tables about how it would be interesting to see our win percentages as a function of the table level. some of the top players are high-rated because they win tons at lower-rated tables. some of the top players are high-rated because they win on the highest-possible-rated tables. i guess its possible to make assumptions who is who based on total number of games played... but it would still be fun to click your profile page and see these new stats.
(if youve already planned for this in the next release, i wouldnt be surprised). |
Replies 1 - 7 of 7
|
jurgen wrote
at 6:22 AM, Friday November 16, 2007 EST If this would have been posted in the idea section, I would surely click "Ryan should do this". I try to keep track of my stats at the 200 and 1k tables myself but I usually forget some on bad kdice days so....good idea from Mr.1 (let's see for how many days)
|
|
KdiceInquisitor wrote
at 6:36 AM, Friday November 16, 2007 EST great idea
|
|
Ryan wrote
at 8:11 AM, Friday November 16, 2007 EST Nice idea. I had thought about doing this with the next version. Now I just may. The reason I was hesitent is because I was thinking of having top 100 trophies for each level instead of overall. But this would complicate the rank readings at the table.
It's fairly easy for me to add a total per level just as an informative thing. |
|
Vermont wrote
at 8:36 AM, Friday November 16, 2007 EST I think extra medals would be over the top, but having it there for information purposes would be great!
|
|
|
Ryan wrote
at 8:46 AM, Friday November 16, 2007 EST There's quite a bit I can do with stats with this update. There's not much new stuff but the architecture changes should make things perform better and allow more flexibility with stats.
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 8:57 AM, Friday November 16, 2007 EST Stat heaven.
|
|
XCRobin wrote
at 10:00 AM, Friday November 16, 2007 EST That would be neat.
|
