Forum
Quick, I need a math whiz!
|
|
Valis wrote
at 8:37 PM, Monday October 8, 2007 EDT
Valis's turn
kdw defended 2v1: 5 to 5 (1,4 to 5) Laughing Monkey defended 5v4: 14 to 17 (1,3,6,2,2 to 3,3,5,6) Snoopy2 defeated 3v2: 11 to 2 (4,3,4 to 1,1) odds please |
|
OMGHARRYPOTTER wrote
at 8:45 PM, Monday October 8, 2007 EDT 1/(2C1*5C43C2*YOURMOM)
SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE |
|
_\o/_ wrote
at 9:20 PM, Monday October 8, 2007 EDT 1 in 18
|
|
Disasterz wrote
at 10:07 PM, Monday October 8, 2007 EDT Snape kills dumbledore?!?!?!
|
|
|
Valis wrote
at 10:08 PM, Monday October 8, 2007 EDT Hmm, I was thinking more like a > 5%.
Can you give me *your* averages for each? |
|
|
Valis wrote
at 10:11 PM, Monday October 8, 2007 EDT Phoenix37's turn
l.o.s.e.r. defended 3v8: 13 to 23 (5,3,5 to 1,1,6,4,3,1,3,4) l.o.s.e.r. defeated 4v8: 20 to 18 (6,3,5,6 to 2,1,1,1,2,1,4,6) l.o.s.e.r. defeated 3v5: 12 to 8 (3,4,5 to 1,2,1,1,3) l.o.s.e.r. defended 2v5: 7 to 14 (4,3 to 3,1,2,5,3) l.o.s.e.r.'s turn Phoenix37 defended 5v4: 13 to 15 (5,4,2,1,1 to 3,3,4,5) 3 days ago what're the odds on this one? |
|
Earl Grey wrote
at 10:12 PM, Monday October 8, 2007 EDT I made it 1 in 100
with the odds of winning all three just over 1 in 3 |
|
kevin12345 wrote
at 10:39 PM, Monday October 8, 2007 EDT well the 4vs 8 is a 0.6 percent chance, the 3 vs8 is a .1 percent chance the 3 vs 5 is a 5 percent chance and the last one is 2.2 percent lol
|
|
UnleashGodsFury! wrote
at 11:54 PM, Monday October 8, 2007 EDT Ph for the president?
|
|
JKD wrote
at 2:04 AM, Tuesday October 9, 2007 EDT Yo again ;)
"l.o.s.e.r. defeated 4v8: 20 to 18 (6,3,5,6 to 2,1,1,1,2,1,4,6) l.o.s.e.r. defeated 3v5: 12 to 8 (3,4,5 to 1,2,1,1,3)" There's a link to the wiki to the left of the game with a table at the bottom, for some reason there's a probability table on kdice wikipedia too: 4v8: 0.6% 3v5: 6.1% I'm not saying 100% those numbers are right but if they're wrong then someone should be able to prove what the correct numbers are? Anyway, for this case *given* that you have lost a 4v8 (which is 0.6%) you have a 6.1% chance of losing your 3v5 attack. To clarify, winning 2vs6 is only about 0.1% But winning a 2vs6 *given* that you have already won a 2vs6 is *still* just 0.1%. 2vs6 is a very rare roll but don't be shocked if it happens twice in a row to someone. If you want to be shocked you have to say "I bet my next two 2vs6's shall both lose" and then do it. If one happens *given that the other has happened* then it's only 0.1% Some people have won the lottery more than once I believe? It's possible. But if someone says "I've never won the lottery but I will win it twice" they're crazy. I can only guess that you're saying bad dice made "loser" lose the first roll and the broken system made Phoenix's odds of winning the next roll > 6.1%. When I analyze the individual dice on those rolls and the ones on my profile page I do not see a rigged dice pattern occurring. I'm trying to help you prove whether or not it's broken --because I want an accurate probability table-- but what else do you want me to try besides my eighty 4vs3 rolls? All the best! |
|
SodaPop wrote
at 4:07 AM, Tuesday October 9, 2007 EDT odds for the first set:
0.044 4.4% odds for 2nd set. l.o.s.e.r. defeated 4v8: 20 to 18 (6,3,5,6 to 2,1,1,1,2,1,4,6) l.o.s.e.r. defeated 3v5: 12 to 8 (3,4,5 to 1,2,1,1,3) in series: is 0.000366 0.03% |