play the higher tables?

Dices correct me if i am wrong but in the new system you get higher points for risking more on a higher risk table not for playing better players. In the old system you were rewarded for playing better players not for playing higher risk poker. Furthermore i have been told by several prominent players that this system rewards people for stacking the higher table with "point feeders" and not always the best players. I have been told that often these point feeders are moved up the chain under the guise of having "good luck days."

I agree, playing the higher tables isnt playing better players, its playing higher stakes poker.
If you put the top 7 players on a high stakes table, at least a couple of them could lose rank to ppl ranked 8-12. If you're the number 7 player should you be dropped in rank to 15 because you played with 6 people ranked better than you?

.
i miss getting an 8 stack ... hiding in the corner like a girlie man ... and somehow taking third or second place ...
.
good times.
.
.
.
.
.
just kidding ... those days sucked .... long live the new kdice!

This is one thing that annoys me to no end.

Exactly what Jumblies said. Playing higher stakes does not mean higher skills.

It really sucks to play on a board with someone who just wants to mess with people and doesn't give a flying fig about their score.

I do care about my score and this game as nerdy as it sounds and I want a good fair game. Doesn't seem to be happening lately.

And -- yes Suicide Noobs -- I have witnessed these "lucky days".

to counter Suicide Noobs, how about we allow negative scores?