I always agree you, Mona, of course. ;)

Spanish translation (free):

Siempre estoy de acuerdo contigo, Mona, por supuesto. ;)

Yeah ... why?

I agree.
Since the game is 99.5% luck by now it takes a long time to reach a level where strategy might come into it.
Resetting every month (why not every day...) makes this effort pointless.

Or we make the game even faster:
Once we have 7 players points are added and subtracted at random. This is what it is like most of the time. We save all the useless time we now spend rolling, pointing, chatting...

My impression of the worthless "improvements" that have been made.

In this version, what's the incentive to build score?

To be able to play on higher tables with fewer people for a few days at the end of the month before you are reset?

I think we should be reset every month but just not to zero. It is unfair to expect the top players to play with beginners every month. They will soon become bored with the game as they are cut again for no reason. I think however the reset serves a purpose so that one player doesn't always remain at the top. I think every month we should be reset to the start of the level we were at the previous month. So for example all players with 500 to 2499 points would be reset to 500 and so on.

^ i like this idea

I agree with Dauphin. It's a good system. However, no one has proved how easy or difficult it can be to get to the top tables yet.

XCButtcrack

That will be my next name ... its funny .. AND people will think i'm in "the clan".

ROFL.

Not really a clan so much as it is one guy with like 16 names. Wait thats most of us......