Forum
SURVEY: Points per place
|
torquemada wrote
at 11:46 AM, Tuesday September 4, 2007 EDT
What points are you seeing awarded for each place?
For 3rd - 7th, it has almost all been negative points, have seen a couple of +1's for 3rd, but mostly negative. For 2nd, average seems to be 4 points, have seen +2 to +8. Just curious. Thanks for your input. |
Replies 1 - 5 of 5
|
JKD wrote
at 11:59 AM, Tuesday September 4, 2007 EDT I think an easier way is to get 7 players to wait until round 3 and then flag in order of domination.
|
|
|
torquemada wrote
at 12:32 PM, Tuesday September 4, 2007 EDT That wouldn't work.
Mainly wondering about 2nd place, seems like 4 points isn't much for 2nd. |
|
|
JKD wrote
at 1:16 PM, Tuesday September 4, 2007 EDT From the last game I played:
(-? for 5th and -3 for dominance) (+0 for 4th and -4 for dominance) (+3 for 3rd and -5 for dominance) (+6 for 2nd and +4 for dominance) (+13 for 1st and +13 for dominance) None of us flagged early enough, but I think this case was pretty good. I like the rank/place points because 4th started at 0 and it doubled after that so everyone gets a good deal there. I liked the dominance points because there was only two dominant players in the game, no one else mattered; this is the way it is in most games, if you can't get top 2 dominance then you should lose points unless you make comeback to get 1st. And everyone got punished for not allying to take down 1st. If anything I'd say 2nd made more points than he deserved, hopefully only because of the unwillingness to flag of the other players. |
|
|
torquemada wrote
at 2:48 PM, Tuesday September 4, 2007 EDT last game
3rd = 0 2nd = 6 1st = 12 |
|
rnd wrote
at 3:09 PM, Tuesday September 4, 2007 EDT Mikeypoo's turn
Josélito Michaud finishes 2nd in round 28. Rank: 2nd Score: +15 to 368◆. (+19 for 2nd and -4 for dominance) Josélito Michaud stands up Mikeypoo finishes 1st in round 28. Rank: 31st Score: +84 to 192◆. (+39 for 1st and +45 for dominance) Mikeypoo stands up BOOM |
