Forum
Differences in table ratings?
|
rotk6 wrote
at 5:38 PM, Thursday August 16, 2007 EDT
I just went from playing on the 1600 tables to the 2000 tables in only a few days. My question is... How is play different on the 2000 tables and what can I expect?
This is really a fun game... When does the new rating system kick in? |
Replies 1 - 6 of 6
|
Disasterz wrote
at 8:40 PM, Thursday August 16, 2007 EDT 2000 tables are slow to start up and can get slightly boring due to the many pgas and "friends." If you want to continue having fun I suggest creating new accounts and just playing the 1800 or 1600 tables.
|
|
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 9:25 AM, Friday August 17, 2007 EDT 2k tables are fine and there are not as many pga's out there as you people seem to think there are. No one chats in the lower tables making them boring for that reason alone 2k > everything else.
|
|
DoobiusMalcor wrote
at 1:45 PM, Friday August 17, 2007 EDT 2k players are predictable and easily dominated. < 2k players are random and petulant.
The worst possible score to have in kdice is 1999. |
|
pastry wrote
at 11:24 PM, Friday August 17, 2007 EDT "The worst possible score to have in kdice is 1999. "
I briefly had that mockery of a score... |
|
Eleventeen wrote
at 12:41 AM, Saturday August 18, 2007 EDT You should log on AIM, make a new buddy group called "pga" and ask for screen names. It's a foolproof plan.
|
|
unlucky9999 wrote
at 1:07 AM, Saturday August 18, 2007 EDT lol. Some1 has experiance eh?
|
