It would be nice but....

nope

Never kill aways first. Always truce between First and second.

http://kdice.wikispaces.com/

TAAAA DAAAA

alwasy kill away/flagged first..if they are away and flagged, they dont wanna play, kill them, even if there is a weker player whos still fighting, at least hes trying... afkers/flaggers go first...

No, I'm not going to attack an away player if it doesn't make sense for me. For instance, heavily-fortified territories owned by away players can be nice buffers against aggressive enemies. I'm not about to remove that for the sake of some illusory ethical code.

Besides, sometimes away players are only temporarily away because they've lagged out. It doesn't necessarily seem more ethical to target away players in every case.

Truces between 1st and second players: As soon as this happens you might as well flag! 1-2 truces kill games.

In an ideal world away-ers should be killed first alas there are sometimes reasons why you can't.

One other common courtesy. If you do form a truce then you should be prepared to follow it through - regardless of the outcome. The idea of claiming flags when it starts going to custard is an outrage.

you see 1-2 truces in

The one unwritten rule which really needs to be engraved is:

Always let the NachoMaster win! This NEVER happens! Keep that in mine and stop, drop and....scream!