Forum
8 v 8 's in first
|
ferg wrote
at 5:41 AM, Friday June 8, 2007 EDT
does anyone else find that the person in first
consistently wins more 8 v 8 battles towards the end of the game? is it skewed in favour of 1st? |
Replies 1 - 5 of 5
|
JKD wrote
at 7:53 AM, Friday June 8, 2007 EDT Tell that to 1-2 alliances that have been slaughtered by buddy in third.
|
|
|
JKD wrote
at 7:55 AM, Friday June 8, 2007 EDT 1st place should have more rolls, so they should be more likely to even out over time? Anyway you could be on to something, just saying I haven't noticed it at all though.
|
|
Scaldis Noel wrote
at 3:08 PM, Saturday June 9, 2007 EDT Nonsense, the odds are the same. Please don't start another discussion about how the odds are screwed up, it gets really old hearing the same silly thing for the 800th time.
UNLESS... ...maybe Ryan is trying to mess with our minds. Yeah, that's got to be it. |
|
JDizzle787 wrote
at 2:20 AM, Sunday June 10, 2007 EDT No, but I've noticed a "pattern" where whoever wins does it by consecutive won rolls.
|
|
gohstlee wrote
at 11:32 AM, Sunday June 10, 2007 EDT I don't believe there is anything deterministic about it... it's pretty much dumb luck.
That said, it seems to be a rule that if you save up to +32, and make a bunch of attacks at once, they all fail. Could be 4 or 5 in a row. Naturally, I think that is dumb luck too, but I've had no luck at all, when saving up. ;-) |
