Damn, mike. That's a kick ass idea. But, there needs to be a way to start even, cuz I think I might lose a lot, just because of bad luck (and I know I'd be playing duels more than actual games. I'm such a piss-off)

If you've ever played dicewars with just 2 players, whoever goes first wins more often than not.

Right Stunned, if "more often" is defined as 85%; considering that players would play a lot smarter then the DiceWars AI, I'd say 95%.

i agree with the idea ^^

duel tables could be more complicated than just "whoever goes first wins more often than not".
Beside that when you go to duel you do know what can happen with you.
:)

Comparing it to the known "back-to-back-going-10-steps-turn-around-and-shoot" duels this would be like standing back to back, going 10 steps, turn around and then one of the opponents gets 2 minutes to carefully aim and if he misses, the other guy can have his try.

Under these circumstances I'd rather keep my gloves on - to strangle my enemies from behind.

How about sorted maps, 15 vs 15 terrs all connected and fully stacked? They would've got to be really twisted to make it fun and strategic though...

Am I the only one not buying the fake Russian? Rotten word order and grammar but perfect spelling? Nobody else? Just me? Oh well. Maybe I'll be "killed out for a month or two" for the merest suggestion.

Okay, okay, on topic.

A duel is usually a battle of wills, or skills, but not really luck. I don't think it's possible to determine to anyone's satisfaction which of two angry players is the better player when rolling dice is the M.O.