If you want to play at the top 100 tables (or whatever it is) you have to try harder than the other 1900s :P

I know Ryan does the tables based on # of people within the scores but there has to be something done about such a gap. I know im at 1967 and I really can't play games against the 1700 players and expect to go anywhere quickly (except down). We definently need both 1900s and 2000s

Boo-friggin'-hoo.

Maybe it won't last... this evening there are no 2000 tables... just 1900's.

Just managed to get into 1900s and have held my own for four or five games. Now with only 1700 tables this is pretty difficult.

As soon as you are near a table cutpoint then you as good as in no-mans land. It would help to have something to smooth out this anomaly rather.

All of you who posted who have no sympathy obviously ignore the sonsabitches on the 1700 tables. If anything, I call the top 100's easier than fucking pie, because, 90% of the games I've played up there, I haven't had any gripe about one bumb move some one has made. Huh, coincidence? or, is it that 1700 tables is MOSTLY, NOT ALL populated by people who had a luck streak in the 1500's, and just ended up there, and fuck up everyone else with awful, and sabatogeing playing styles

theres a few 1900s right now.....

"or, is it that 1700 tables is MOSTLY, NOT ALL populated by people who had a luck streak in the 1500's, and just ended up there, and fuck up everyone else with awful, and sabatogeing playing styles"

heh heh
sometimes I do that on purpose.

And, to add, I apologize when I resort to such barbaric attempts to "win". As you can tell, I'm not in a bad mood, and some people have gotten in my way. (I easily get upset when things don't go my way,a s you can see)

i think that there should be 1900 tables as well as the 2000.

im am over 2000 elo and have been for some time yet i see playerd drop below 2000 and are relagated to the 1700 tables...this is no good at the top as it takes ages to get back up there playing with ppl whos elo is 17xx