Forum
eliminate the most skilled player (highest score) at the table first to increase you chance of winning
12:16 PM, Friday January 4, 2008 CST
kdicefreak
|
the title says it all......
this strategy is based on the assumption that the higher score player are actually more skilled.....of course unless they earn the points by cheating..... |
12:19 PM, Friday January 4, 2008 CST
kdicefreak
|
*your
|
12:20 PM, Friday January 4, 2008 CST
montecarlo
|
perhaps, offer them a truce in the chatbox. seems most of the high-score players are truce-whores and realize how critical it is to have strong friendly neighbors in order to get high scores.
|
12:37 PM, Friday January 4, 2008 CST
MadHat_Sam
|
LEARN TO BE GOOD AT KDICE! Then you will be the highest score at a table and can pwn like the rest of us.
|
3:05 PM, Friday January 4, 2008 CST
rnd
|
i <3 kdicefreak.
|
6:50 PM, Friday January 4, 2008 CST
mugambo
|
I'm a truce whore. The highest bidder wins.
|
9:39 AM, Monday January 7, 2008 CST
geoisonfire
|
"perhaps, offer them a truce in the chatbox. seems most of the high-score players are truce-whores and realize how critical it is to have strong friendly neighbors in order to get high scores."
Not really, in fact turce wouldn't be a good choice for people who wants to get more pts. I used to truce a lot back to the old days. (before Sep, 2007). But nowdays, rules changed, sometime you helped someone else but can screw yourself. I find it is really easy to win for people who get over 1000pts to play in a table with min o pts. However, "eliminate the most skilled player (highest score) at the table first to increase you chance of winning" does seem to be a good idea :) |
9:51 AM, Monday January 7, 2008 CST
¤Unique¤
|
KdiceFreak is correct. It is best to eliminate highest score player immediately.
|
10:40 PM, Monday January 7, 2008 CST
Vermont
|
One problem with this theory is that you are then playing specifically against one player instead of against all six.
As an example, we've all seen games where someone has tried to take revenge for past perceived wrongs, and all it does it get both players involved killed quickly, typically both for somewhere in 5th-7th. Certainly, if a particular attack truly doesn't matter to you positionally, you hit the player who is the bigger threat to you in that particular game...it may very well be the player with the highest score...but often it may not be. An exception to this would be if you know someone on the table is gunning for you. You may want to be a little more aggressive against that person to try to prevent it, but again its just more likely that you both do poorly. Anyway, that's my two cents. |
8:05 AM, Thursday January 10, 2008 CST
|
Avi G
|
Vermont, you trying to say that PGEs are stupid, pointless, and ultimately just plain silly?
I'm Shocked. And Amazed. |
9:03 AM, Thursday January 10, 2008 CST
Vermont
|
Actually I didn't use any of those words. Occasionally PGAs are fun and well deserved. However, they typically don't get you any points.
|

Membership
Discussion
Player Notes
Strategies
Ideas
